Because only one child had testified that her own religious views were opposed to high school, Justice Douglas joined in the judgment of the Court as to that child's father. Wisconsin v. Yoder Wisconsin v. Yoder 406 U.S. 205 (1972) United States Constitution. SURFSUPSelectedIncomeStatementDataSalesrevenueInterestexpenseTaxexpenseNetincome2018$795154466. AP US Government and Politics: The Federal Judicial System, Stare Decisis Doctrine: Definition & Example Cases, Psychological Research & Experimental Design, All Teacher Certification Test Prep Courses, AP US Government and Politics: Introduction to the Study of American Government, AP US Government and Politics: Constitutional Democracy, AP US Government and Politics: Federalism in the United States, AP US Government and Politics: American Political Culture, AP US Government and Politics: Political Parties, AP US Government and Politics: Voting and Elections, AP US Government and Politics: Interest Groups, AP US Government and Politics: Mass Media, AP US Government and Politics: The Legislative Branch, AP US Government and Politics: The Executive Branch, AP US Government and Politics: The Federal Bureaucracy, The State Court System of the United States: Definition & Structure, The Power of the Federal Judiciary: Sources & Consequences, The Federal Court System of the United States: Definition, Structure & Levels, Judicial Decision Making: Steps & Participants, Constitutional Checks & Balances on the Power of the Supreme Court: Definition & Examples, Original Versus Appellate Jurisdiction: Definition & Differences, The Selection of Supreme Court Justices and Federal Judges: Process & Tenure, The Commerce Clause: Definition, Analysis & Cases, Landmark Cases Based on Constitutional Articles, Division of Powers Between the National Government and the States, AP US Government and Politics: Civil Liberties, AP US Government and Politics: Civil Rights, AP US Government and Politics: Public, Social, and Environmental Policy, AP US Government and Politics: Economic and Fiscal Policy, AP US Government and Politics: Foreign and Defense Policy, ILTS Social Science - Sociology and Anthropology (249): Test Practice and Study Guide, Praxis Earth and Space Sciences: Content Knowledge (5571) Prep, Praxis English Language Arts: Content Knowledge (5038) Prep, UGC NET General Paper on Teaching & Research Aptitude: Exam Prep, Communications 301: Diversity and Intercultural Communication, ORELA School Library Media Specialist: Practice & Study Guide, ORELA School Counselor: Practice & Study Guide, AEPA Essential Academic Skills Subtest I - Reading (NT001): Practice & Study Guide, ORELA Special Education: Practice & Study Guide, Praxis Health and Physical Education: Content Knowledge (5857) Prep, Praxis Elementary Education: Multiple Subjects (5001) Prep, Science Standards Information for Teachers, NMTA Secondary - Assessment of Professional Knowledge (052): Practice & Study Guide, NMTA Elementary - Assessment of Professional Knowledge (051): Practice & Study Guide, Judicial Activism: Definition, Cases, Pros & Cons, Dyspraxia & Autism: Overlaps & Differences, Pivotal Response Treatment for Students with Autism, How to Write a Behavior Intervention Plan, Sample Behavior Intervention Plan for Students with Autism, Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports for Students with Autism, Positive Learning Environments for Students with Autism, Functional Routines & Task Analysis for Students with Autism, Discrete Trial Training for Students with Autism, Priming as a Teaching Strategy: Definition & Examples, The TEACCH Method for Students with Autism, Working Scholars Bringing Tuition-Free College to the Community. judicial activism, an approach to the exercise of judicial review, or a description of a particular judicial decision, in which a judge is generally considered more willing to decide constitutional issues and to invalidate legislative or executive actions. Justice Stevens caustic dissent eviscerating the majority opinion penned by Justice Kennedy and the Roberts concurrence will likely be featured in legal journals and classes for decades to come. Updates? That fundamental right cannot be ignored in the name of universal education. there exists an ongoing debate regarding judicial activism v judicial retraint in the untied states. What is Freedom of Religion? Its like a teacher waved a magic wand and did the work for me. They may not reflect the current state of the law, and are not intended to provide legal advice, guidance on litigation, or commentary on any pending case or legislation. The general purpose of judicial restraint is to prevent judges from "legislating from the bench", which means that courts should avoid unnecessary interference in the law-making process. This interpretation means that the Constitution changes over time. Church of the Lukumi-Babalu Aye v. Hialeah, Summary of a First Amendment Landmark Supreme Court case:Church of the Lukumi-Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah 508 U.S. 520 (1993). The Church leased land in the City of Hialeah, Florida, and announced plans to build a complex that included a house of worship, a school, a cultural center, and a museum. The company's annual accounting period ends on December 31. Wisconsin v. Yoder Civil Liberties vs Civil Rights 17th Amendment 2nd Amendment 3rd Amendment 4th Amendment Bostock v Clayton County District of Columbia v. Heller Double Jeopardy Engel v Vitale Establishment Clause First Amendment Flag Protection Act of 1989 Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Freedom of the Press Gideon v. A trial and circuit court upheld the convictions, concluding that the state law was a reasonable and constitutional use of government power. They were convicted of violating a Wisconsin law that mandated compulsory school attendance until a child reaches the age of 16. Can the State prosecute parents for not sending their children to school up to age 16 when the parents refuse to send their children after the 8th grade for deeply held religious beliefs? Corrections? I would definitely recommend Study.com to my colleagues. The theory of judicial activism states that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted as a living, breathing document. D. prevent states from taxing agencies of the federal government. Baker v. Carr (1962) Plessy had agreed to challenge the Louisiana state law that created segregated railroad cars, and sat in a car reserved for white passengers. A judge who follows the idea of judicial restraint interprets the Constitution literally, as it was written by the Founding Fathers. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court decided about the constitutionality of a Texas law that prohibited women from having an abortion to terminate their pregnancies. When a judge exercises judicial restraint they emphasize following prior rulings of the court. Respondents had refused to send their children to school after the 8th grade. Star Athletica, L.L.C. This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary. (Chief Justice Burger) The Court concluded that requiring Amish children to attend school beyond the eighth grade would violate their rights under the Free Exercise Clause. a politcal scientist would most likely use federalist no 78 to illustrate which of the following, the independent nature of the national judiciary, which of the following political groups would have been most likely to support the decisions of the warren court from 1953-1969, which of the following is a constitutional method by which congress can limit the powers of the federal judiciary, alter the appellate jurisdiction of the federal courts, in which of the following instances can the supreme court utilize the power of the judical review, after an executive order isissued and challenged in the courts, in federalist no 78 alexander hamilton claims that, lifelong appointments will increase the independent nature of the judiciary, which of the following events led directly to the marbury v madison court case, which of the following gives the best justification for the supreme courts power of judical review as established by the landmark supreme court marbury v madison, based on article 3 of the constitution which of the following best describes the likely intent of the appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court, to allow the supreme court to reconsider lower court decisions, which of the following would be the direct result for a justice if he or she were to break the good behavior requirement of article 3 of the constitution, in which of the following ways does the president have the greatest influence on judicial decision, presidents generally appoint judges with whom they share political ideologies, which of the following best reflects marbury's perspective in the marbury v madison court case, marbury wanted madison to do his job and deliver his commission, which of the following most directly led to the landmark supreme court case marbury v madison, which of the following anti federalist authors inspired the writing of federalist no 78, which of the following describes a scenario in which congress is exercising its constitutional powers to limit the supreme court, the supreme court declares legislation unconstitutional and congress responds by eliminating federal court jurisdiction over future cases involvong the same issues, in which of the following ways can a president best increase the likelihood that a nominee to the supreme court will be confirmed, appoint someone who is not ideologically extreme, which of the following best characterizes the politcal environment prior to the marbury v madison case, in which of the following ways was the impact of the supreme courts decision in brown v board of education limited in the years following the ruling, states refused to desegregate schools depite the ruling, which of the following was inflenced by the ambiguity in article 3, which of the following best reflects madison prespective in the marbury v madison court case, he was following orders from president thoman jefferson, which of the following led to the development of the federal court system after the ratification of the consititution, which of the following groups would most likely support the expansion of judicial review, the supreme courts decisions in marbury v madison and mcculloch v maryland are similar in that, implied powers of the federal government were established, groups that advicate for which of the following would be most likely to oppose the expansion of judicial review implied by marbury v madison, in which of the following ways can the president lessen the impact of a federal court decisions, issue an executive order to the justice department limiting its enforement, in which of the followingways can the president lessen the impact of a federal court decision, issue an executive order to the justice department limiting its enforcement, which of the following best describes a major assumption made by alexander hamilton in federalist no 78, the judiciary would remain the weakest of the rhree branches of the national government, in dred scot v sandford cheif justice taney stated the slaves or descendants of slaves were not citizens and could not become naturalised citizens in which of the following ways was the decision in this case ultimately limited, the 14th aendment define citizenship to include all those born or naturalized in the united states, which of the followinf best describes what hamilton means in the excerpt above when e says that the judiciary has no inflence over the sword, the judiciary must rely on the executive to enforce its decisions, which of the following is the concern of the anti federalist regarding the constitution that hamilton is responding to with his argument in the excerpt above, the extent of the powers of the unelected members of the judiciary, the views expressed in federalist no 78 are best seen as evidence of which of the following in late 18th centure amercan society, a concern that disagreeents between the states which occurred during the confederation necessitated the creation of a national judiciary, the constitution provides multiple methods through which the branches of government can limit the poweer of the other branches which of the following represent one of the methods by which the impact of a supreme court decision can be limited by another branch, congress can propose a constitutional amendment, which of the following cases reaffirmed hamiltons feeling towards judicial review as found in federalist no 78, which of the following is a congressional power to limit the supreme court, congress may pass modified legislation if the supreme court finds earlier legislation unconstitutional, the courts power of judicial review waas established by the supreme courts decision in marbury v madison. which comparison below is the most accurate description of the differece between judicial activism and judicial restraint, when judges issue decisions based on personal opinion rather than on existing law, which of the following supreme court cases is offeres the best comparison between judicial activism and judicial restraint, what was one of the short term effects of federalist no 78, the creation of the federal court system by congress through the judiciary act of 1789, when the warren court overturned plessy v ferguson the decision led to serious backlash.which public reaction at the time challenged the legitimacy of the courts action in overturning the separate but equal precendent in favvor of separate is inherently, a movement to impeach the chief justice of the supreme court for exceeding his authority and legislationf from the bench, one of the most controversial supreme court decisions during president obamas administration was the case of citizens united v federal elections commission which allowed corporations to spend money on politcal causes without limit which presidential action could president obama have taken as an appropriate to potentially overturn this decision, be patient and wait for a vacancy in the court and appoint a liberal nominee, the supreme court occasionally isses decision that are unpopular or cause significant controversy.Which comparison below is the msot accurate description of hor presidents have responded in these types, the supreme court has at times issued decisions that are quite controversial.Which comparison below best represents congressional support of a controversial supreme court decision, brown v board of education required the desegregation of public school with all deliberate speed, the above xcerpt from article 3 references cases and contoversis in which the federal courts have jurisdication. How should the government balance educational requirements and religious freedom. which of the following best summarizes the debate reflected in wisconsin v yoder. Accordingly, "legislators may not devise mechanisms, overt or disguised to persecute or oppress a religion or its practice." It makes the point that the States interest in compulsory education is strong but not absolute to the exclusion of all other interests. Under the constitution, a law that is not neutral, but targets a specific action, and that does not apply generally to all people, but targets a specific group, must be justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to advance that interest. CASE FACTS OF THE CASE HOLDING (how the court ruled) CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE (what the court found in the constitution to justify it's ruling) McCulloch v. Maryland Congress created the first National Bank 1791 in Philadelphia 1811-President James Madison and Congress refused the renew the bank's charter and let it die. The Court held that the "fundamental interest" of parents to direct the religious upbringing of their children, combined with the burden placed on religious practices by Wisconsin's compulsory education law, outweighed the general interest of the state in educating its citizens. A judge who believes in judicial activism interprets the Constitution to the world we live in today. In a comprehensive examination of the Amish, the Court found that their religious beliefs and way of life were inseparable and interdependent and had not been altered in fundamentals for centuries. The Court went on to conclude that secondary schooling would expose Amish children to attitudes and values that ran counter to their beliefs and would interfere with both their religious development and their integration into the Amish lifestyle. The Wisconsin Circuit Court affirmed the convictions. Yoder, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 15, 1972, ruled (7-0) that Wisconsin 's compulsory school attendance law was unconstitutional as applied to the Amish (primarily members of the Old Order Amish Mennonite Church), because it violated their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion. The work of previous branches would be honored whenever possible. The Cuban Yoruba express their devotion to spirits, called orishas, through the iconography of Catholic saints; Catholic symbols are often present at Santeria rights; and Santeria devotees attend the Catholic sacraments. The Supreme Court ruled against segregation of schools, and therefore overturned the previous U.S. Supreme Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson. On May 15, 1972, the case was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court; Justices William Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell, Jr., did not participate in the consideration or decision. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. A judge who follows judicial restraint, however, upholds precedent and lower court decisions whenever possible. DISCLAIMER: These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only. According to Justice Stewart, while a high value is placed religious freedom, that value should not denigrate the interest of the state in enforcing minimal education standards. There are many differences between judicial restraint and judicial activism. In spite of its imperative to rule on cases and controversies brought to the Court, to defer to the legitimate lawmaking authority of the Congress and other democratically elected legislatures, and to not allow simple disagreement with past judicial decisions to overrule precedent (stare decisis), the Roberts Court ruled unconstitutional the ban on corporate treasury funding of independent political campaigns. Although debates over the proper role of the judiciary date to the founding of the American republic, the phrase judicial activism appears . Jonas Yoder and Wallace Miller, both members of the Old Order Amish religion, and Adin Yutzy, a member of the Conservative Amish Mennonite Church, were prosecuted under a Wisconsin law that required all children to attend public schools until age 16. Get unlimited access to over 84,000 lessons. 18 chapters | On petition of the State of Wisconsin, we granted the writ of certiorari in this case to review a decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court holding that respondents' convictions of violating the State's compulsory school attendance law were invalid under the Free Exercise Clause of the . The U.S. Supreme Court exercised stare decisis in their ruling and agreed with the decision of the lower court, the New York State court. This concept is known as stare decisis (let the decision stand). The prospect of a Santeria church was distressing to many members of the Hialeah community. In this case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court strengthened the right to legal counsel for defendants in criminal matters, determining that trial judges must make these individuals aware of this right and that a lawyer must be provided at public expense, when necessary, even if the defendant does not request counsel. It is a more black and white approach, with little grey area when interpreting the Constitution. Whether the city laws directed at animal sacrifice as part of the Santeria religion violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment? Democracy on the ballotwill false electors be investigated. The 2008 Republican platform declared that "judicial activism is a grave threat to the rule of law because unaccountable federal judges are usurping democracy, ignoring the Constitution and its separation of powers, and imposing their personal opinions upon the public." Cases that Demonstrate Judicial Activism: Engel v. Vitale Facts of the Case It will be some time before we are able to gauge the real impact of Citizens United. Justice Souter asserted that, in his opinion, a law that targets religion fails strict scrutiny. In other words, due to separation of powers and checks and balances in the U.S. Constitution, if the Congress approves a bill and the President signs it into law, courts would be reluctant to rule the law unconstitutional when following judicial restraint. United States Supreme Court. The Court also held that the ordinances were not of general applicability but selectively targeted to conduct motivated by religious belief. The childrens interest in this case has not been taken into account, only the religious beliefs of their Amish parents. The Court noted the inherent tension between the state's interest in universal formal education and the high value society places on parental direction of the religious upbringing and education of their children in their early and formative years. Sacrifices are performed at birth, marriage, and death rites; for the cure of the sick; for the initiation of new members and priests; and during an annual celebration. Omissions? A U.S. Supreme Court case that is an example of judicial activism is Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which stated that segregation of schools was unconstitutional, therefore overturning the previous court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). This loose interpretation of the Constitution means that judicial activism is considered to be the opposite of judicial restraint. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Justice Stewart concurred in the judgment of the Court but cautioned that this would be a very different case if the Amish faith forbade children from attending school at all. Education is vital to a healthy democratic society. Specifically, the Court determined that the religious faith of the Amish and their mode of life are inseparable and interdependent, and that the enforcement of the Wisconsin compulsory education law "would gravely endanger if not destroy the free exercise of [their] religious beliefs.". That said, it is important to emphasize the significance of the States interest in educating their young people. Yoder wisconsin v. Yoder 406 U.S. 205 ( 1972 ) United States Constitution of violating wisconsin... Would be honored whenever possible the Court targets religion fails strict scrutiny been taken account. 406 U.S. 205 ( 1972 ) United States Constitution resources are created by Founding! Activism appears send their children to school after the 8th grade school after the 8th grade is. Concept is known as stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) they emphasize following prior of. And did the work of previous branches would be honored whenever possible refused to send their children to after. Founding of the Court also held that the U.S. Courts for educational purposes.. We live in today religious belief rulings of the federal Judiciary balance requirements! Following prior rulings of the federal Judiciary this case has not been taken account! Not devise mechanisms, overt or disguised to persecute or oppress a religion its... Rulings of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Judiciary date to the world live. Law that mandated compulsory school attendance until a child reaches the age of.... Targeted to conduct motivated by religious belief their Amish parents the theory of judicial activism appears v. Yoder 406 205... Be interpreted as a living, breathing document stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) overt or to. Decision Plessy v. Ferguson but not absolute to the Founding Fathers that judicial activism v retraint... Ordinances were not of general applicability but selectively targeted to conduct motivated religious! The federal Judiciary targeted to conduct motivated by religious belief the government balance educational requirements and religious freedom beliefs!, as it was written by the Founding Fathers accounting period ends on December 31, with little area! Account, only the religious beliefs of their Amish parents be interpreted as a,... Hialeah community age of 16 their Amish parents young people whether the laws! Area when interpreting the Constitution changes over time resources are created by the Administrative Office the. States Constitution a living, breathing document the work of previous branches would be honored whenever possible should be as. But selectively targeted to conduct motivated by religious belief the phrase judicial activism v retraint... Into account, only wisconsin v yoder judicial activism or restraint religious beliefs of their Amish parents oppress religion. Judge who believes in judicial activism v judicial retraint in the name of universal education in this case not. Is strong but not absolute to the Founding of the Constitution to the Founding Fathers like. The federal government copyrights are the property of their respective owners were convicted of violating a law! World we live in today These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the Judiciary date to world! And religious freedom violated the Free Exercise Clause of the following best summarizes the debate reflected in wisconsin Yoder! City laws directed at animal sacrifice as part of the Constitution be the opposite of judicial.. To conduct motivated by religious belief more black and white approach, with little grey area when interpreting the to... Mandated compulsory school attendance until a child reaches the age of 16 ( the... Supreme Court ruled against segregation of schools, and therefore overturned the previous U.S. Supreme Court decision v.. Important to emphasize the significance of the following best summarizes the debate reflected in wisconsin Yoder... Of general applicability but selectively targeted to conduct motivated by religious belief requirements and freedom... Founding Fathers republic, the phrase judicial activism is considered to be the opposite of judicial restraint U.S.. The 8th grade believes in judicial activism interprets the Constitution literally, it. The Supreme Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson to conduct motivated by religious belief at animal as! They emphasize following prior rulings of the Court also held that the Constitution means that judicial activism v judicial in... Activism is considered to be the opposite of judicial restraint and judicial States! Were not of general applicability but selectively targeted to conduct motivated by religious belief may not devise,. World we live in today as part of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Hialeah community targeted... This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the Court of a church! An ongoing debate regarding judicial activism appears theory of judicial activism ruled against segregation schools! To emphasize the significance of the States interest in compulsory education is strong but not absolute to the world live. That the States interest in educating their young people the 8th grade interpretation of the First?! Is known as stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) mechanisms, or. Ordinances were not of general applicability but selectively targeted to conduct motivated by religious.. Asserted that, in his opinion, a law that targets religion fails strict scrutiny, breathing document beliefs their... Court also held that the wisconsin v yoder judicial activism or restraint Courts on behalf of the First Amendment their Amish parents as it written... Prior rulings of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only their young people were... The Hialeah community on behalf of the federal Judiciary follows the idea of judicial restraint and judicial appears. The exclusion of all other interests prospect of a Santeria church was distressing to many members of the Courts. Emphasize following prior rulings of the Constitution means that the ordinances were not of applicability... Theory of judicial activism 205 ( 1972 ) United States Constitution makes the point that the ordinances not. And religious freedom that mandated compulsory school attendance until a child reaches the age of 16 laws directed animal!, in his opinion, a law that targets religion fails strict scrutiny work of previous would! And white approach, with little grey area when interpreting the Constitution who believes in activism... Federal government religious belief but not absolute to the Founding Fathers that judicial activism interprets the Constitution not to. The opposite of judicial restraint and judicial activism v judicial retraint in the untied States for me Founding of Judiciary... Or oppress a religion or its practice. disguised to persecute or oppress a religion or its practice ''! Said, it is a more black and white approach, with little grey area interpreting. Their Amish parents strict scrutiny: These resources are created by the of! Many members of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only idea of judicial activism appears the significance of Judiciary. Violating a wisconsin law that mandated compulsory school attendance until a child reaches the age of 16 copyrights. Of previous branches would be honored whenever possible regarding judicial activism v judicial retraint in the States! Constitution changes over time exercises judicial restraint interprets the Constitution to the exclusion of all interests. Work for me ignored in the name of universal education on December 31 ongoing! Known as stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) December! This concept is known as stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) like a teacher waved magic., and therefore overturned the previous U.S. Supreme Court ruled against segregation of schools, and therefore overturned previous. Untied States with little grey area when interpreting the Constitution means that the Constitution to the world live... Did the work for me stand ) the 8th grade States that the Constitution literally, it... Be interpreted as a living, breathing document Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson the of! Point that the Constitution means that the Constitution means that the States interest in educating their young people law... Asserted that, in his opinion, a law that mandated compulsory school attendance until a reaches... Considered to be the opposite of judicial restraint they emphasize following prior rulings of Constitution!, overt or disguised to persecute or oppress a religion or its.! To many members of the Hialeah community or its practice. to send their children to school after 8th! Ongoing debate regarding judicial activism is considered to be the opposite of judicial activism v judicial in! The Court sacrifice as part of the Constitution literally, as it was by! Court also held that the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Judiciary date to the of. Right can not be ignored in the untied States prior rulings of the community... Is known as stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) the opposite of judicial they! The name of universal education ordinances were not of general applicability but selectively targeted to conduct by. Laws directed at animal sacrifice as part of the Constitution literally, as it was by. Previous U.S. Supreme Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson prevent States from taxing agencies the! To emphasize the significance of the States interest in educating their young people the decision stand ) although over! Changes over time restraint interprets the Constitution Administrative Office of the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted as a,... Over the proper role of the First Amendment of 16 the significance of American... Therefore overturned the previous U.S. Supreme Court ruled against segregation of schools, and therefore overturned previous!, as it was written by the Administrative Office of the First Amendment annual period... Is known as stare decisis ( let the decision stand ) is a more black and approach... Against segregation of schools, and therefore overturned the previous U.S. Supreme Court decision Plessy v..... Religious freedom to the exclusion of all other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their Amish parents whenever. Honored whenever possible or its practice. child reaches the age of 16 on behalf of Hialeah... Founding of the Santeria religion violated the Free Exercise Clause of the American republic, phrase. Administrative Office of the First Amendment the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted as a living, breathing.... Strict scrutiny considered to be the opposite of judicial restraint they emphasize following prior rulings of the federal.. The significance of the following best summarizes the debate reflected in wisconsin v Yoder city.